The answer is NO
When two clauses have the same subject, we can reduce the proposition in two ways:
[Liên từ] S1 + V1 + ……, S1 + V2 + …….
+ If V1 has an active meaning: remove S1 from the first clause and return V1 to Ving form
+ If V1 has a passive meaning: remove S1 in the first part and return V1 to Vp2 . form
Considering the topic sentence, because the two sides have the same subject, the verb in the first clause has the active meaning, so according to the structure, we bring it back to the Ving form. However, because to emphasize that the action of the first part happened before the action of the second part in the past, we use “having Vp2”. => Answer A uses Ving => false
B. According to the structure: “Only after + clause + [hình thức đảo ngữ] => true
C. Wrong, because according to the structure: “No sooner + had Vp2 …..+ than + S + V (simple past) = Hardly + had Vp2 …… + when + S + V (past simple): as soon as …..then……”
D. Wrong structure, with the structure: “Not until + clause + [hình thức đảo ngữ]: until…. then ……”