Clip: VirusSs gives an interview about the issues surrounding the chicken swarm
Used to be a chicken and was herded
Hi VirusS,
Recently, the name VirusSs is so noisy! Just been accused of “trafficking” and being accused of participating in an advertisement for a gambling game that hides the shadow of virtual money… are you okay?
I’ve been through scandals hundreds of times bigger than this, such as when I broke up with rumors about a third person, or controversies with other singers, even sitting still and doing nothing. “hit the bullet”.
With not very positive information spreading, I actively informed my partners to limit participation, even asked for permission to withdraw from the fund and many other activities. My point is that no matter what happens, it won’t affect my brothers, friends, projects…
VirusSs is a controversial topic because of a series of introductory video tutorials
Why did VirusSs choose to speak up, even though I knew that if I had more statements at this time, it would be easy to push me into new controversies?
When something difficult happens, it’s already set up. We should not blame or think because of anything. And as a man I should face it – not avoid it. VirusSs is different from others in that being “muted” will not turn off Facebook, hide posts and go somewhere for a few days. No, I still speak normally. Because basically I didn’t do anything wrong. In bad luck, there is luck, people forget it all at once, no one can say one thing forever.
Being told by Zet Under “less than 3 months of experience but asking to go herd”, how did ViruSs feel at that time?
Everyone knows ViruSs is a streamer, a YouTuber with 9, 10 years of experience. It’s very normal for someone to criticize, say this and that to me. As soon as I know that comment, I can completely hide it or not reply, but I still leave it. Deleting/hiding or getting angry doesn’t solve the problem.
Zet Under “sends” VirusSs to drive chickens despite less than 3 months of experience
So VirusSs has only “entered the job” for less than 3 months, is it true?
Whether you join 5 years, 50 years, 3 months or 5 days, the reason people trust you and you are fine, partners still cooperate with you…. It proves you haven’t done anything wrong. And I won’t explain how long I’ve been in the market because it doesn’t solve any problems.
In investing, even if you have been in the market for 50 years, you still make mistakes as usual. So proving yourself involved longer than 3 months, 3 years or 30 years is nothing!
The word “chicken” sounds sensitive like… how is it cheating?
It just sketches a portrait of a person who can’t invest, specializes in calling for new investors, F0 now and makes people feel proud, no problem. Everyone understands that, entering this cryptocurrency market is determined to lose money to get out. No one wins forever. VirusSs also takes a lot of money, maybe I am also a chicken who has been driven by other people before.
I also lost quite a bit of money, somewhere a few thousand dollars, several tens of thousands of dollars and also made mistakes in terms of projections about the operation of receiving information. By the way, VirusSs wants to emphasize one thing: Everything you read is what people want for you to read, you feel is what people let you feel. If you research deeply, it’s only 50 – 50, even if you’re 99% sure, nothing is certain.
Cryptocurrency is a venture capital category. Before putting money down, think carefully and even if it costs money, it will not affect your life, it will be better.
“Perhaps I’m also a chicken and have been herded by other people before.”
In essence, people who don’t know much but want to get rich quickly are liquidity and investment chickens. Their loss is someone else’s gain, poor investors give money back to better people.
It’s not just about making video clips, it can also be opening a teaching class, forming a group, asking this question and asking that, or enticing this person, then it’s the chicken.
Good players will eat bad players’ money: That’s it!
VirusSs says there are people who “deserve to be lured”, other than slapping investors in the face?
Must understand the nature of money game investment is that you buy first, a good position, you will be more profitable than the buyer later. And when you sell, that profit is calculated based on the loss of the following buyers. People who have no knowledge but also buy with money, do you agree, do they deserve to be “pushed”? Who will be the one to generate profit for the winner? It is the loser.
Regardless of the information VirusSs gives or anyone gives, people should not believe it because the nature of investment is that good players will eat bad players’ money. And VirusSs always tells everyone this is just information, whether to pay down or not is everyone’s decision.
Why do Zet Under and you “war of words” online without communicating directly? Or do the two need to shake hands to “make a little image” to attract players?
Affirming always for everyone to wonder: Me and Mr. Zet Under never shook hands, never met, never chatted. In the investment world, no one wants to be the center of attention. When investing property, no one wants to be famous, because then everyone knows what you invest.
On the other hand, when people are honored and seen as the center of attention, they will be very high. It’s the feeling that shows them as heroes trying to eliminate evil. And the army that followed them was also very proud.
If ViruSs is a hero, do not say, but ViruSs is a person on the villain side, because only then will ViruSs not be the focus anymore. When watching a movie about superheroes, monsters appear, the monster is the focus, but when the hero defeats the monster, the focus shifts to the hero. What will the hero have to do next? The hero will go find another monster to kill. But if the hero doesn’t do that, then he’s not a hero anymore.
Clip: Viruses against Lawyer Ha
If Zet Under loses money because of investment according to VirusSs, pay 100%
Continuously the projects that ViruSs introduced are accused of “bottoming out” of pain, if it is “risky”, isn’t that a bit too much?
If you or someone reading this article knows which group wins and wins, then just introduce ViruSs and lose as much money as ViruSs. No one knows what the future of this market will look like.
“Who gets rich so quickly, who is poor, if everyone wins like that, who loses?”
Who gets rich so quickly, who is poor, if everyone wins like that, who loses. A lot of people use that content to attack VirusSs but in reality they are not the buyer at that price, they are just using that as an excuse, they must have bought that coin.
If Mr. Zet Under bought that price because I said it and now it’s split by two, then ViruSs pays him 100% of the money. You have been a market participant for a long time, but if you still have this problem, I am very sorry. But if it’s not you but someone else, I don’t care.
“I’m rich”, does ViruSs think I’m too complacent when I write a comment like this?
Arrogant or not it lies in the style, arrogant or not it lies in the way of working. But arrogant or not it is not in the comment section. And especially the comment cut out like that, how can it be explained.
By the way, I would like to talk about an issue that recently in my fan group, people have posted and asked a lot. It is a very famous lawyer guy on TikTok saying that the community of VirusSs is having negative effects.
ViruSs once participated in the AMA for the IP blockchain project Data from CoinMarketCap recorded, noon on December 26, the price of the IP token (I*P) is currently fluctuating at $0.0085/token.
Lawyer Ha in the video warns of two types of games that “hide the shadow of virtual money” to gamble in disguise
VirusSs would like to answer on 3 aspects:
At this time, he is not the only lawyer, ViruSs also has its own lawyer. The basic knowledge of the law you should know and I also know very well.
Second, what he said about ViruSs on his TikTok with a decent face mask, according to ViruSs, was a bit too hasty, a bit sad and a bit disappointing for this time. The road is a lawyer who gives information based only on the basics of visuals and hearing, which is taboo in the industry. When you don’t have proof, don’t accuse anyone. Analysis has to be 2-way analysis but this guy only analyzes one-way. It is wrong not to know about blockchain to talk about blockchain law.
The third thing, you should remember, because you have no knowledge, so you receive and conclude that it is a completely wrong conclusion, so note that not all information we can receive.
Thank you for sharing VirusSs!
Information about cryptocurrencies (cryptocurrency), commonly known as “virtual money” has not been recognized by law in Vietnam. The information in the article is for reference only and has no investment recommendation value.
GameFi (short for Game + Finance) is a term for blockchain games that incorporate financial elements. The information in the article is for reference only and has no investment recommendation value.
.